Difference between revisions of "Lack of direction"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
# <span style="font-size: 16px">Management doesn't support automation so it is done underhand by a lonely crusader. ''[[INADEQUATE SUPPORT]]'' is the issue to look up in this case</span> | # <span style="font-size: 16px">Management doesn't support automation so it is done underhand by a lonely crusader. ''[[INADEQUATE SUPPORT]]'' is the issue to look up in this case</span> | ||
| − | # <span style="font-size: 16px">Automators believe that they have to automate the manual test cases as is. You probably have a case of ''[[MANUAL MIMICRY]]''</span> | + | # <span style="font-size: 16px">Automators believe that they have to automate the manual test cases as is. You probably have a case of ''[[MANUAL MIMICRY]]'' or ''[[INTERDEPENDENT TEST CASES]]''</span> |
# <span style="font-size: 16px">Testers doing automation don't know how to do it well. The issue ''[[LIMITED EXPERIENCE]]'' can help you solve this kind of problem</span> | # <span style="font-size: 16px">Testers doing automation don't know how to do it well. The issue ''[[LIMITED EXPERIENCE]]'' can help you solve this kind of problem</span> | ||
# <span style="font-size: 16px">Tool use or testware architecture is different from team to team</span>. <span style="font-size: 16px">Look up the issue ''[[LOCALISED REGIMES]]''</span> | # <span style="font-size: 16px">Tool use or testware architecture is different from team to team</span>. <span style="font-size: 16px">Look up the issue ''[[LOCALISED REGIMES]]''</span> | ||
# <span style="font-size: 16px">The important tests have not been automated, only the easy ones. This could be a case of ''[[UNFOCUSED AUTOMATION]]''.</span> | # <span style="font-size: 16px">The important tests have not been automated, only the easy ones. This could be a case of ''[[UNFOCUSED AUTOMATION]]''.</span> | ||
| − | <br /> <span style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">Return to [[Improve or revive test | + | <br /> <span style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #000000; font-size: 16px">Return to [[Improve or revive test automation]]</span></div> |
Latest revision as of 14:25, 18 March 2019
Please select what you think is the main reason for the lack of direction
For the following items the issue of choice is AD-HOC AUTOMATION:
Return to Improve or revive test automation
For the following items the issue of choice is AD-HOC AUTOMATION:
- Nobody is in charge of test automation, everybody does what he or she thinks best without cooperating with the others
- Automation is done ad-hoc without a leading strategy or architecture
More reasons for lack of direction:
- Management doesn't support automation so it is done underhand by a lonely crusader. INADEQUATE SUPPORT is the issue to look up in this case
- Automators believe that they have to automate the manual test cases as is. You probably have a case of MANUAL MIMICRY or INTERDEPENDENT TEST CASES
- Testers doing automation don't know how to do it well. The issue LIMITED EXPERIENCE can help you solve this kind of problem
- Tool use or testware architecture is different from team to team. Look up the issue LOCALISED REGIMES
- The important tests have not been automated, only the easy ones. This could be a case of UNFOCUSED AUTOMATION.
Return to Improve or revive test automation